|
|
Comments: Conserving nature with economics
We offer two comment systems: our "Add a comment" system (no registration) and a social media system (registration with Disqus required). Either one will allow you to post a comment here.
Please note
- Inappropriate and "frivolous" (i.e. First!) comments may not be posted and spam will not be tolerated. "Trolling" attempts will be deleted.
- Comments are approved manually at the discretion of the mongabay.com administrator. Mongabay.com tries to approve comments on a timely basis, but in some cases, comments may take a few days to be approved.
- The comment system is not a way to communicate directly with the author of the article or the site administrator. Please contact the author for requests and corrections.
- Links (urls) are not active in posted comments.
Back to news.mongabay.com/2010/0928-reid_csf_interview.html
All comments
News index
|
|
|
Very interesting article, that rightly points to the fact that economic valuations of the environment itself (and ecosystem services) are maybe not the key argument for combating environmental degradations. A first step should be to argue against some projects based on their own assumed economic rationale, taking stock of the fact that quite often these projects are decided on other grounds than purely economics. Major political decisions on infrastructure or other sectors impacting on the environment are not based on sound economic analysis. So considering ecosystem services in the economic analysis are a kind a cherry on the cake.