|
|
Comments: Nestle caves to activist pressure on palm oil
We offer two comment systems: our "Add a comment" system (no registration) and a social media system (registration with Disqus required). Either one will allow you to post a comment here.
Please note
- Inappropriate and "frivolous" (i.e. First!) comments may not be posted and spam will not be tolerated. "Trolling" attempts will be deleted.
- Comments are approved manually at the discretion of the mongabay.com administrator. Mongabay.com tries to approve comments on a timely basis, but in some cases, comments may take a few days to be approved.
- The comment system is not a way to communicate directly with the author of the article or the site administrator. Please contact the author for requests and corrections.
- Links (urls) are not active in posted comments.
Back to news.mongabay.com/2010/0517-hance_nestle.html
All comments
News index
|
|
|
I don't know ...assuming they are successful in using plantations that are less destructive, won't other users of the oil who were using the oil from those plantations now use oil from the worst plantations since Nestle has hogged up the supply? Isn't it all a bit like squeezing water from one end of a balloon to another?
Biodiversivist
Unilever has set the bar high. Check out their announcement of Nov 2009 suspending future purchases from palm oil supplier PT Smart. Kudos to them and to Nestle for seeing the light.
But we consumers need to reduce demand by boycotting products that include palm oil unless specified "sustainably produced" (as does Newman's own cookies). THAT is ours to do!