|
|
Comments: Scientists: new study does not disprove climate change threat to Amazon
We offer two comment systems: our "Add a comment" system (no registration) and a social media system (registration with Disqus required). Either one will allow you to post a comment here.
Please note
- Inappropriate and "frivolous" (i.e. First!) comments may not be posted and spam will not be tolerated. "Trolling" attempts will be deleted.
- Comments are approved manually at the discretion of the mongabay.com administrator. Mongabay.com tries to approve comments on a timely basis, but in some cases, comments may take a few days to be approved.
- The comment system is not a way to communicate directly with the author of the article or the site administrator. Please contact the author for requests and corrections.
- Links (urls) are not active in posted comments.
Back to news.mongabay.com/2010/0319-hance_amazon_letter.html
All comments
News index
|
|
|
This is a very helpful letter from 19 respected Amazon scientists that try to put this "controversy" in perpective (as I discussed here: http://tinyurl.com/yfpc9lo).
So the Amazon rainforests aren’t totally “out of the woods” or guaranteed to “go up in smoke”, but they are still very susceptible to dieback due to global warming as these respected scientists highlighted.
I for one would rather not risk losing an area of rainforest larger than the continental U.S. because some ill-cited peer reviewed studies or new study raised some uncertainty. As my colleague has pointed out (here and here) there are plenty of facts on-the-ground that point us clearly towards the need to reduce our global warming pollution. The Amazon and the planet aren’t worth such a risky bet.