|
|
Comments: Mining and biodiversity offsets in Madagascar: Conservation or 'Conservation Opportunities?'
We offer two comment systems: our "Add a comment" system (no registration) and a social media system (registration with Disqus required). Either one will allow you to post a comment here.
Please note
- Inappropriate and "frivolous" (i.e. First!) comments may not be posted and spam will not be tolerated. "Trolling" attempts will be deleted.
- Comments are approved manually at the discretion of the mongabay.com administrator. Mongabay.com tries to approve comments on a timely basis, but in some cases, comments may take a few days to be approved.
- The comment system is not a way to communicate directly with the author of the article or the site administrator. Please contact the author for requests and corrections.
- Links (urls) are not active in posted comments.
Back to news.mongabay.com/2009/0830-rowan_rio_tinto_madagascar.html
All comments
News index
|
|
|
The point about the Malagasy govt. having a “20% stake” in the mine should be clarified. (“The Malagasy government, with a 20% stake and in the face of the largest investment in its history, is unlikely to act as a watchdog….”)
The Government of Madagascar actually has just an option to buy a 20% capital share in QMM. It would need to take out a loan estimated at (US) $117 million to do this.... It has already taken out several World Bank loans, including one for US$35 million for its contribution to building a new port for shipment of the ilmenite. In other words, rather than getting any significant fragment of the profits, they’re more likely to get next to nothing. Probably, the only real ‘trickle down’ effects will be losses for future generations. Perhaps a handful of ministers and others in key positions will see some personal enrichment.
This is the continuing story of our raping the planet and disregarding most of those who occupy it. We barely realise our actual power to do otherwise.
Like precious hardwoods, gems, and other resources, the ilemite leaves the country as a raw material, leaving the population unskilled and the land empty. Until these resources are processed in the country, thus developing the skills of laborers, the country is condemned to the exploitive practices of investors, the World Bank, and Malagasy politicians who do little to require investors to "pay" for their access to resources.