|
|
Comments: The unknown role of coextinctions in the current extinction crisis
We offer two comment systems: our "Add a comment" system (no registration) and a social media system (registration with Disqus required). Either one will allow you to post a comment here.
Please note
- Inappropriate and "frivolous" (i.e. First!) comments may not be posted and spam will not be tolerated. "Trolling" attempts will be deleted.
- Comments are approved manually at the discretion of the mongabay.com administrator. Mongabay.com tries to approve comments on a timely basis, but in some cases, comments may take a few days to be approved.
- The comment system is not a way to communicate directly with the author of the article or the site administrator. Please contact the author for requests and corrections.
- Links (urls) are not active in posted comments.
Back to news.mongabay.com/2009/0528-hance_coextinctions.html
All comments
News index
|
|
|
Cool pictures!! I have never seen those insects before. Very nice.
www.fredjsmilek.com
“The only value one might ascribe to a panda in terms of conservation, that a panda mite would not also possess, is charisma and aesthetic appeal...”
Really? I'd expect that a pandas' extinction would have many more far reaching and profound environmental reverberations that that of its parasite. Regardless of speculation, interesting as it is, concerning loss of specialists possibly opening the door to more destructive generalists.
Insofar as parasites and mutualists being unrepresented in conservation efforts, isn't it simply true that if you save the endangered host/pollinator you also ensure the survival of its dependents? Why further complicate the already difficult political process of translating environmental degradation into effective policy? Which isn't to say that we don't need to broaden our understanding of the role of these relationships in ecosystems.
The Sumatran insect reminds me of the woolly beach blight aphid.
C.M.